Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. O'Connor
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
The question for decision, one of first impression in this court, is this: Does the New York Automobile Assigned Risk • Plan of insurance, which in explicit terms provides only for prospective cancellation, abrogate the insurer’s common-law right to void a policy from its inception on the ground that it had been obtained through fraud or misrepresentation?
The facts are undisputed. In his application for insurance under the New York Automobile Assigned Risk Plan, Thomas O’Connor falsely stated that he had not been convicted of any non-vehicular offense within the preceding three-year period.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. MaloneySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
3Cited by32 opinions
- Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. SaccioSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MundorfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Midland Risk Management Co. v. WatfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Pall, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.