Legal Opinion
Perez Y. Compania v. Triton Pacific Maritime Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 29, 1986No. Civ. A. No. H-84-2198PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDONALD, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion of Triton Pacific Maritime Corporation to Cancel Security and Dismiss Plaintiff’s In Personam Claim Pursuant to the Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, of Defendant Triton Pacific Maritime Corporation (hereafter “Triton”). Having considered the arguments of the parties and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.
I. Background
This action began as an in rem claim under Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure against the motor vessel MEXICO I for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- The ResoluteSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Richland Plantation Company v. Justiss-Mears Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perez & Compania (Cataluna), S.A., Cross-Appellant v. M/v Mexico I, Etc., and Triton Pacific Maritime Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987