Legal Opinion

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-506Published

1Dissent

The issue presented in this case, the subrogation rights of an underinsured motorist insurance carrier when its insured wants to settle with the tort-feasor, has been described as "[t]he single most important unresolved issue concerning underinsured motorist coverage," and it has been said that "[c]losely aligned with the subrogation issue is the question of when and under what circumstances an underinsured carrier can refuse permission to the plaintiff to settle with the liability carrier." 49 Ala. Lawyer 284 (Sept. 1988).

I think that the majority has answered these important questions…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API