Legal Opinion

Neill v. Kimball

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1944No. 27914. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The initial question requiring consideration on this appeal is whether a freehold is involved, within the contemplation of section 75 of the Civil Practice Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1943, chap, no, par. 199.) From the pleadings and the evidence it appears that in 1931 a plan of reorganization was effected by a bondholders’ protective committee representing bonds secured by a trust deed in the nature of a mortgage on property located at 6151 Winthrop avenue, Chicago. Pursuant to this plan, Winthrop Towers Hotel Corporation was created; a new mortgage securing a note for $200,000 was executed; 5…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swinson v. SodamanIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bondurant v. BondurantIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Carlson v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Williams v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kurzawski v. MalagaIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Campo v. GrunewaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Tree v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Stein v. East Oak Street Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Trainor v. Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API