Swinson v. Sodaman
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
The sole question which requires consideration on this appeal is whether a freehold is involved in the litigation. From the pleadings and the evidence it appears that on November 2, 1931, Albert E. Swinson, owner of a seventy-acre farm in Winnebago county, and his wife executed their promissory note for $3000, due in five years, with interest at five and one-half per cent, payable annually, and secured its payment by a trust deed in the nature of a mortgage to Everette G. Patterson. Subsequently, Sylvia Sodaman became the owner of the note. Default was made in the payment of the principal at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ryan v. SanfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Kirchoff v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Kagy v. LukeIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Wright v. LoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Lennartz v. BoddieIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Spies v. DemayoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Carlson v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Cohen v. OgussIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- Horner v. County of WinnebagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Campo v. GrunewaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.