Legal Opinion

Swinson v. Sodaman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1938No. 24683. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The sole question which requires consideration on this appeal is whether a freehold is involved in the litigation. From the pleadings and the evidence it appears that on November 2, 1931, Albert E. Swinson, owner of a seventy-acre farm in Winnebago county, and his wife executed their promissory note for $3000, due in five years, with interest at five and one-half per cent, payable annually, and secured its payment by a trust deed in the nature of a mortgage to Everette G. Patterson. Subsequently, Sylvia Sodaman became the owner of the note. Default was made in the payment of the principal at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. SanfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kirchoff v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kagy v. LukeIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wright v. LoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Lennartz v. BoddieIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Spies v. DemayoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Carlson v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Cohen v. OgussIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Horner v. County of WinnebagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Campo v. GrunewaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API