Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Chapman

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 28, 1981No. 81 C 2157PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Donald Salisbury and a number of other plaintiffs, all of whom claim to be defrauded purchasers in real estate transactions, sue three distinct groups of defendants. Plaintiffs assert claims under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization provisions of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., and pendent state claims. Defendants have moved to dismiss all claims under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

For the reasons stated in this memorandum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Andrew GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Earl BushCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Schaick v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
  3. County of Cook v. Midcon Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Parnes v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  5. Heritage Insurance Co. of America v. First National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API