Wollangk v. Jurgella

Appellants contend that the verdict should stand but the damages allowed to the two plaintiffs, the wife and daughter, should be increased to the least amount that an unprejudiced jury could award, which would be $500 to the wife, Sadie Wollangk, and $750 to the daughter, Jean Wol-langk, in accordance with the motions of these plaintiffs after verdict, the plaintiff Carl P. Wollangk having moved for judgment on the verdict for his damages.

Appellants also contend that if the orders for a new trial are affirmed, the only questions that should be tried are the damages of the plaintiffs Sadie…