Legal Opinion
David McDavid Pontiac, Inc. v. Nix
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided October 31, 1984No. 05-83-00787-CVPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITHAM, Justice.
Appellee, Frances Nix, brought this action under the Deceptive Trade Practices— Consumer Protection Act, TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. §§ 17.41-17.63 (Vernon Supp.1982-1983), against appellant, David McDavid Pontiac, Inc. The action arises out of a sale of an automobile. The jury answered all issues in Nix’s favor. Judgment in favor of Nix awarded actual damages and restoration of the consideration paid and trebled both and awarded Nix attorney’s fees. The trial court denied in-junctive relief against McDavid Pontiac. We conclude that the trial court correctly denied injunctive…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Joseph Chacon, Jr. v. Sam Granata, and Randolph Air Force BaseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Smith v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Cruz v. Andrews Restoration, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- Springs Window Fashions Division, Inc. v. Blind Maker, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Carrow v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Cain v. Pruett, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Texas Cookie Co. v. Hendricks & Peralta, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.