People v. Janes
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strouse
The defendant, Troy Janes, appeals from his conviction of armed robbery and aggravated battery, raising three assignments of error: (1) his constitutional right to confront witnesses was violated when the nontestifying codefendant’s inculpatory hearsay statement was admitted into evidence, (2) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of defendant’s arrest for an unrelated theft offense, and (3) he was denied a fair trial when the prosecutor was permitted to testify as a rebuttal witness and to use his testimony in his closing argument.
The defendant was charged by indictment with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. McKibbinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- The People v. GendronIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. Ted JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- People v. StarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- People v. RayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. GrantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- People v. JordanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- People v. GullyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- People v. PruittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- United States Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. ThieretDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.