Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Newman Brothers Drill. Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1957No. A-6164PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

This is an action to determine the ownership of an undivided one-half of the mineral leasehold estate in 786.33 acres in Kent County. The rights of the parties turn upon the construction and application of the following provisions of two identical oil and gas leases:

“2. Subject to the other provisions herein contained, this lease shall be for a term of five (5) years from this date (called ‘primary term’) and as long thereafter as oil, gas or other mineral is produced from said land hereunder.”

(( :¡c :¡:

“5. If prior to discovery of oil or gas on said land Lessee should drill a dry hole or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clopton Rogers v. OsbornTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. St. Louis Royalty Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Newman Bros. Drilling Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. PoolTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sun Operating Ltd. Partnership v. Holt, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  4. C. C. Duke and C. T. Duke v. Sun Oil Company and Pan American Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Hydrocarbon Management, Inc. v. Tracker Exploration, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API