Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Hackett
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 29, 1950No. A-11449PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.
This is an original action in habeas corpas broaght by petitioner, Elijah L. Hackett. In his petition he alleges that he is being nnlawfnlly restrained of his liberty by O. P Bnrford, warden of the State Penitentiary. In his petition he alleges the caase of his restraint is a certain jadgment and commitment entered against him in the district coart of Oklahoma coanty, Oklahoma, on the 5th day of May, 1938, on a charge of marder in case No. 12093.
He contends said restraint is anlawfal for two reasons. First, becaase he did not waive and was denied the aid of coansel at the time of arraignment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re McNaughtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Wilkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Tilghman v. BurnsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Ex Parte CritserCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Ex Parte WhitsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex Parte ConwayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Ex Parte FaulkenberryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- In Re Habeas Corpus of BrewsterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Ex Parte PruittCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Ex Parte SimmonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.