Legal Opinion

S & C Home Loans, Inc. v. Farr (In Re Farr)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 6, 2002No. BAP No. NC-01-1388-MaRyP. Bankruptcy No. 97-10870. Adversary No. 97-1147PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARLAR, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

A judicial lienholder has challenged the bankruptcy court’s application of § 522(c) 1 to protect the debtor’s entire real property homestead, instead of just the $100,000 claimed allowance under the state’s exemption law. Finding no conflict, on these facts, between § 522(c) and California law, we hold that the court misapplied § 522(c) in invalidating the creditor’s lien in its entirety. We REVERSE.

FACTS

Debtor Mathew Farr (“Farr”), filed a voluntary chapter 7 petition on March 12, 1997. In his bankruptcy schedules, Farr listed a one-half joint…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. William J. Pasquina, P.C. v. Cunningham (In Re Cunningham)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  2. Bank of Cushing v. Vaughan (In Re Vaughan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. In Re HydeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. Stasz v. Gonzalez (In Re Stasz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re RuckdaschelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API