Legal Opinion

State v. Blowers

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1986No. 19712PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendants David A. Blowers and James J. Schofield appeal their convictions of driving under the influence of alcohol. The convictions resulted from an accident that occurred when defendants were drunk and riding horses. The circuit court found that the Utah drunk driving law applied to persons riding horses and convicted both men of driving under the influence of alcohol under section 41-6-44 of the Code. Defendants appealed to the district court, which upheld Schofield’s conviction but reversed Blowers’ conviction and ordered a new trial. Both Blowers and Schofield have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Greaves v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. PackardUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. BradshawUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Conrad v. DillingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. EyreUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. NoelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. NoelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. State v. BlowersUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. EutonPortsmouth Municipal Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API