Thornbrough v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
This appeal raises the question of the constitutionality of Section 2 of Act 86 of 1937, said § 2 being Ark. Stats., § 81-312. This question comes to us in the manner and upon the facts and pleadings hereinafter set out.
The real parties in interest in this litigation are the Capitol Transit Company, an Arkansas Corporation owning the bus franchise in Greater Little Rock, and 158 of its former employees [members of Division 701 of the Amalgamated Union and intervenors] who left the employment because of a strike. On September 26, 1955 said employees, through their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baratti v. Koser Gin CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Boyd v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Goodall v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Arkansas Commission on Pollution Control & Ecology v. Land Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Goodall v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Potts v. HaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.