Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1900No. 3972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Garfield County.

1Opinion of the Court

Chiee Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action, in the nature of ejectment, designated by our code an action for the recovery of the possession of real prop*8erty, was brought by Wilson, the appellee, against the appellant railroad company to recover a strip of ground on which it had built its line of road. The facts are that in June, 1885, the plaintiff, a competent person, entered upon the quarter section of land, of which the strip in question is part, with the intention to acquire title under the preemption laws of the United States, and upon the 20th of that month…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Hutchings v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Red River & Lake of the Woods Railroad v. StureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Korf v. IttenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  2. Slaght v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hemphill v. MoyIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Johnson v. Hawthorne Ditch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Prieshof v. BaumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API