Korf v. Itten
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Yuma District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
The main purpose of this action was to enjoin the defendant in error, a road overseer of Yuma County, from tearing down a portion of certain fences belonging to the plaintiffs in error, for the purpose of opening certain alleged public highways, a portion of which, if opened, will be upon twenty quarter sections of land, admitted to be owned by the plaintiffs in error, unless title to the portion in controversy had become vested in the county for road purposes. The court found that the lands in dispute were public highways and gave judgment accordingly.
The lands in question being under fence,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bardon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Munson v. MarksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Starr v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Lieber v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- Stofferan v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hamerly v. DentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Lakewood v. MavromatisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Leach v. ManhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Lovelace v. HightowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- Camp Bird Colorado, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of OurayColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.