Legal Opinion

Farrington v. Falcey

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 14, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

96 N.J. Super. 409 (1967)

233 A.2d 185

CHARLES E. FARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

WILLIAM H. FALCEY, COUNTY CLERK OF MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued August 14, 1967.

Decided August 14, 1967.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEWIS and LEONARD.

Mr. Frank V. Walsh, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Robert R. Ross on the brief).

Mr. Charles E. Farrington, respondent, argued the cause pro se.

2Per curiam

Defendant county clerk appeals from a Law Division judgment directing that he include plaintiff Farrington's name in the same column with the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. CaputoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Hawkes v. GatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. Perry v. GiulianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  4. Axtell v. CaputoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. In Re HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quaremba v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Gormley v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Giuliano v. ReichensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Lautenberg v. KellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Quaremba v. AllanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API