Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 25, 1996No. 311, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

Following a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant-appellant, Lewis J. Fisher (“Fisher”), was convicted of several drug-related offenses. Fisher’s defense counsel moved for a new trial based, in part, on the grounds that juror misconduct and/or bias denied Fisher his right to trial by an impartial jury, see Del. Const, art. I, § 7; U.S. Const, amend. VI, XIV, § 1. That motion was denied summarily by the Superior Court.

This is Fisher’s direct appeal. This Court concluded that the absence of a hearing, on the allegation that the issue of race was improperly considered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Weddington v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Styler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. Bolt v. HickokDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Young v. FraseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Kittle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API