Fisher v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
Following a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant-appellant, Lewis J. Fisher (“Fisher”), was convicted of several drug-related offenses. Fisher’s defense counsel moved for a new trial based, in part, on the grounds that juror misconduct and/or bias denied Fisher his right to trial by an impartial jury, see Del. Const, art. I, § 7; U.S. Const, amend. VI, XIV, § 1. That motion was denied summarily by the Superior Court.
This is Fisher’s direct appeal. This Court concluded that the absence of a hearing, on the allegation that the issue of race was improperly considered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Weddington v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Styler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Bolt v. HickokDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Young v. FraseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Kittle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.