Legal Opinion

Young v. Frase

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 26, 1997No. 524, 1996PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we affirm the decision of the Superior Court denying a plaintiffs post-verdict motion for additur or, alternatively, a new trial as to damages. We hold that the reasoned consideration by the Superior Court of the adequacy of the jury award was within the discretion of the Superior Court based on evidence presented at trial. We find no basis to disturb the finding of the Superior Court that the amount of the award was not so inadequate as to shock the conscience of the court. In deferring to the Superior Court’s determination, we limit our review to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. DuphilySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. Chao v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Cloroben Chemical Corp. v. ComegysSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hecksher v. Fairwinds Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Estate of Rae v. MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Sherman v. Del. Dep't of Pub. SafetySupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  4. Bell Sports, Inc. v. YarussoSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Cuonzo v. ShoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API