People v. Dackowski
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Convicted of burglary and assault, defendant argues that he was improperly prevented from introducing a written statement purportedly signed by the complaining witness, who spoke only Arabic, and witnessed by one Lalo, who spoke Arabic and broken English. The statement indicated that the complaining witness could not identify her attacker and was prepared by defendant’s attorney and obtained by defendant’s parents who gave the complainant $150 for medical expenses. The statement was in English and defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Green v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BatistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. HaywoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MaisonetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.