People v. Fuller
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fuchsberg, J.
We hold that, in the absence of any statutory requirement for corroboration, consonant with the reflection of social attitudes in prevailing legislative policy, the sworn testimony of a child complainant under the age of 12 need not be corroborated in a prosecution for her forcible rape. We also conclude that, in the circumstances of this case, defendant’s guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Defendant James Fuller was convicted upon a jury verdict of two counts of first degree rape growing out of a single criminal episode. The indictment was brought on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. NisoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BerzupsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. GroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.