Legal Opinion

People v. Fuller

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1980PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Fuchsberg, J.

We hold that, in the absence of any statutory requirement for corroboration, consonant with the reflection of social attitudes in prevailing legislative policy, the sworn testimony of a child complainant under the age of 12 need not be corroborated in a prosecution for her forcible rape. We also conclude that, in the circumstances of this case, defendant’s guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Defendant James Fuller was convicted upon a jury verdict of two counts of first degree rape growing out of a single criminal episode. The indictment was brought on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Wheeler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. NisoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. BerzupsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. GroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API