Legal Opinion

Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 3, 1940No. 4598PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY, Associate Justice.

On August 10, 1922, an agreement was entered into between the United States and Germany for a mixed Commission to determine the amount to be paid by Germany in satisfaction of Germany’s financial obligations under the treaty of August 25, 1921, in respect of claims of nationals of the United States against Germany for loss, damage of injury to their persons or property by reasons of acts of the German Government or of its agents since July 31, 1914, a copy of which agreement is annexed to the complaint herein as Exhibit A.

Pursuant to said agreement, the Commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mellon v. Orinoco Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lasier v. LasierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  3. Purman v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bergeron v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  2. Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Whayne v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1953
  4. Bergeron v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  5. Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API