Legal Opinion
Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1941No. Nos. 381, 382PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
Petitioners, Z. & F. Assets Realization Corporation and American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, are holders of awards of the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany. ' These awards have been certified by the Secretary of State and are thus payable out of the fund established by the Settlement of War Claims Act of 1928.1 Petitioners seek a judgment declaring that later awards purporting to be made by the Mixed Claims Commission in favor of the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, the Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, the Bethlehem Steel Company and others, aré null and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Williams v. HeardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Houston v. OrmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States Ex Rel. Boynton v. BlaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Oklahoma v. United States Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Canadian Transport Company, a Division of MacMillan Bloedel (Alberni) Limited Bocimar N v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.