Legal Opinion

Department of Human Resources Ex Rel. Holland v. Holland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1994No. S93A1349PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

The Georgia Department of Human Resources (DHR) brought this action against appellee in the name of appellee’s adult daughter to recover child support arrearages and to revive a dormant decree. The trial court ruled that the daughter was not the proper party to bring the action and that, there being no disputed issues of fact, appellee was entitled to summary judgment. This court granted DHR’s application for discretionary review and posed the following question: Is summary judgment appropriate when the trial court concludes that the proceeding has not been brought by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Livsey v. LivseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Department of Human Resources v. FleemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Warshaw Properties v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Levine v. SeleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Wurlitzer Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First Christ Holiness Church, Inc. v. Owens Temple First Christ Holiness Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Spurlock v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. Moon v. Mercury Ins. Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Fincher v. Holt (In Re Holt)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1994
  5. Town & Country Dodge, Inc. v. World Omni Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API