Department of Human Resources v. Fleeman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hunt, Presiding Justice.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Department of Human Resources (DHR) is precluded by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, or otherwise, from recovering from the alleged father child support benefits paid on behalf of a child, and from establishing the alleged father’s future obligations for child support, where the divorce decree between the mother and the alleged father states that the parties had no minor children. We granted certiorari to Fleeman v. Dept. of Human Resources, 208 Ga. App. 97 (430 SE2d 135) (1993), in which the Court of Appeals held…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norris v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- MacUch v. PetteyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Department of Human Resources v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Cox v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Pike v. ArmburstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3Cited by18 opinions
- Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Community State Bank v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- League v. Graham (In Re Graham)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- Wickliffe v. Wickliffe Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Butler v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.