Legal Opinion

Barber v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 3, 1931No. 6 Div. 70PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The garnishee in response to the writ filed a written answer, and thereafter, but during the same term, the garnishment was continued and the garnishee was ordered to answer orally in open court on a day certain. Question, May he be interrogated as to payments made the defendant from the service of the writ up to the oral answer, or shall the inquiry be made only as to the peiiod between the service of the writ and filing the written answer?

We think that the case of Lady Ensley Furnace Co. v. Rogan & Co., 95 Ala. 594, 11 So. 188, is in point and holds that the inquiry may go to any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henry v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Lady Ensley Furnace Co. v. Rogan & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Montgomery Candy Co. v. Wertheimer-Swarts Shoe Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Brantley v. Standard Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Piper Ice Cream Co. v. J. L. Walker & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Bowen v. CrowAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API