Legal Opinion

People v. Waterman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1961PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

Indicted with two others in February of 1959, under the fictitious designations of “ John Doe ” and “ Bichard Boe ”, the defendants Waterman and Devine were convicted of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, second degree grand larceny and assault.1 The Appellate Division, by a divided court, reversed the judgments of conviction against both defendants and ordered a new trial. It was the Appellate Division’s view that it was error to receive in evidence incriminatory statements made by the defendant Waterman — in which he also implicated his codefendant Devine—under questioning by a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. People v. DoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. The People v. . McMahonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API