People v. Waterman
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
Indicted with two others in February of 1959, under the fictitious designations of “ John Doe ” and “ Bichard Boe ”, the defendants Waterman and Devine were convicted of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, second degree grand larceny and assault.1 The Appellate Division, by a divided court, reversed the judgments of conviction against both defendants and ordered a new trial. It was the Appellate Division’s view that it was error to receive in evidence incriminatory statements made by the defendant Waterman — in which he also implicated his codefendant Devine—under questioning by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. DoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- The People v. . McMahonNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- People v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.