Hildrup v. Town of Windfall City
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Tipton Circuit Court; W. TP. Mount, Judge. Action by Jefferson R. Hildrup against the town of Windfall City and others to enjoin defendants from removing a shade tree in front of his residence. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Henley, P. E
This was an action against the appellees, the town of Windfall City and William Minnick, Samuel Gaddis and Samuel Dingle, contractors, to enjoin said contractors from removing a shade tree in front of appellants residence and within the boundaries of the street which said contractors were improving under employment by said city. The complaint was in four paragraphs. The validity of the proceedings leading up to the order of improvement and contract is not attacked. The court made a special finding of facts, and stated conclusions of law thereon. The court’s conclusions of law are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Chase v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Mt. Carmel v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Town of Ladoga v. LinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Robinson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912