Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Broadhurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1958No. Civ. 22703PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERNDON, J. pro tem. *

The determinative question pre sented on this appeal is whether it must be held as a matter of law that by the terms of a property settlement agreement respondent, the divorced wife of an insured, effectively waived her right to receive, as beneficiary, the proceeds of a policy of insurance on the life of her former husband.

In this interpleader action brought by the insurance carrier, the tripartite contest over the policy proceeds was waged in the trial court by (1) respondent, the former wife of the insured, who was the named primary beneficiary, (2) appellant, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Beck v. West Coast Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Sticka v. Mellon Bank (DE) Natl. Assoc. (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  3. Culbertson v. Continental Assurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In the Matter of Toula Freeman, AKA Toula Freeman Raasch, Toula Wig & Toula Enterprises, Bankrupt. Alfred Freeman v. George RitnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Estate of KincaidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API