Legal Opinion

Page v. Page

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1964No. 10044Published

1Opinion of the Court

15 Utah 2d 432 (1964)

394 P.2d 612

RUTH JENSEN PAGE AND RUTH JENSEN PAGE, AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE AND PERSON OF ANE KIRSTINE PAGE, A MINOR, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,

v.

MEREDITH PAGE AND MAURINE S. PAGE, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

No. 10044.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 6, 1964.

Dahl & Sagers, Midvale, for appellant.

Pugsley, Hayes, Rampton & Watkiss, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

CALLISTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment that declared void on grounds of public policy a provision in a decree of distribution that restrained the plaintiff from alienating certain real property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Campau v. CheneMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Davis, Et Ux. v. GeyerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Sisters of Mercy v. LightnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Kamas State Bank v. BourgeoisUtah Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API