Legal Opinion

Kamas State Bank v. Bourgeois

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1963No. 9798PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment in a real property mortgage foreclosure action brought by respondent Kamas State Bank against the mortgagors, Joseph F. and Joan Bourgeois, and J. Buys Cummings and Mary Cummings, the mortgagors’ grantees and appellants herein.

The record discloses that the real property involved in this suit had been the home of the parents of J. Buys Cummings, an appellant herein. The parents died intestate, leaving surviving them as their heirs eight sons and daughters. The entire estate consisted of this home, which had been encumbered with a welfare…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ChaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Brace v. BlackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Anderson v. RiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Clark v. SheltonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tovrea v. UmphressCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Clark v. SheltonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Page v. PageUtah Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API