Legal Opinion

Boulder, Colorado, Sanatorium v. Vanston

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1908No. 1212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appe’al from the District Court for Chaves County before William H. Pope, Associate Justice. ■ “The name and address of the plaintiff's attorney must be endorsed on every summons.” Compiled Laws* 1897, sec. 2685, par. 4, sub-sec. 19; Stuyvesant v. Weil, 57 X. Y. S. 595; Hale v. Gee, 29 S. W. 44; Ivelso v. Norton. 87 Pac. 184; Sharman v. Huot, 63 Am.

Read the full summary

Appe’al from the District Court for Chaves County before William H. Pope, Associate Justice. ■ “The name and address of the plaintiff's attorney must be endorsed on every summons.” Compiled Laws* 1897, sec. 2685, par. 4, sub-sec. 19; Stuyvesant v. Weil, 57 X. Y. S. 595; Hale v. Gee, 29 S. W. 44; Ivelso v. Norton. 87 Pac. 184; Sharman v. Huot, 63 Am. S. Rep. 645; Durham v. Bettertson, 14 S. W. 1060; Eorbes v. Darling, 54 X. W.--385; Liberty v. Haines, 64 Atl. 665. There could be no final judgment against appellant while the action was still pending against her co-defendant. In some cases there…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

MANN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the District Court of Chaves County, in favor of the appellee, the Boulder, Colorado, Sanatorium, against the appellant, Kate Vanston, for One Hundred Fifty-three and 10-100 Dollars for medical treatment, nursing, board, etc., alleged to have been rendered her by the ap-pellee. The action was brought by the appellant and on® Easton, as co-defendant, and a summons issued and served personally on each of said co-defendants, each of whom appeared specially and moved to quash the service on the ground, principally, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Pry v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Neosho Valley Investment Co. v. CornellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  4. Crane v. PennyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crowell v. KoppNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Guthrie v. Threlkeld Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Miera v. SammonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Nevada Douglass Gold Mines, Inc. v. District Court of Seventh Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API