Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Millican
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was for loss by negligence of an oil well and lease. The claim was that in doing a squeeze cementing job on the well, defendant had done the work negligently with the result that the well had been ruined and the lease lost.
Defendant denied that it had contracted as alleged by plaintiff and that it was in anywise negligent. It pleaded specially: (1) that under its usual form of contract it rented its cementing equipment and furnished men to deliver and operate it under the supervision of the well owner, and that if the well was lost by negligence it was the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International-Great Northern R. v. CaseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Taylor v. CatalonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Fairfax Gas & Supply Co. v. HadaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. DaggettTexas Supreme Court · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Celanese Corp. Of America v. John Clark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Spence & Howe Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- S. D. Rorem v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.