Legal Opinion

Gray v. Rothschild

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Yew York county; Miles Beach, Justice. This was an action by Bryce Gray, William Miller, and others against Maier, Charles M., Jacob M., and Abraham Rothschild, to recover damages caused by an alleged conspiracy. From an order and interlocutory judgment sustaining a demurrerto the complaint, for misjoinder of parties plaintiff, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The plaintiffs consist of seven different firms, who sold goods, at different times, to the defendants Charles M. Rothschild and Jacob M. Rothschild, who were copartners, carrying on business in the city of Yew York, under the name of Charles M. Rothschild & Co. It was alleged, in support of their right to maintain a joint action against the purchasers of the goods, together with Jacob M. Rothschild and Abraham Rothschild, that the goods had been obtained by means of false representations, and that the purchasers, together with the two other defendants, had entered into a conspiracy under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Cadigan v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Murray v. HayNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  4. Scofield v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Loomis v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nagel v. LutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Ford v. Sutherland Springs Land & Town Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Wood v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Jerome v. RustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API