Legal Opinion

Vanderheiden v. MARANDOLA

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 5, 2010No. 2009-69-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

This case came before the Supreme Court on April 6, 2010, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. 1 The defendant, Edward Marandola, Jr. (Edward or defendant), appeals from an order of the Family Court enforcing an arbitrator’s decision that declared that it was reasonable for Edward to be required to pay for two years of private high school tuition for his son. The defendant argues on appeal that the Family Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waterman v. CaprioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Gorman v. GormanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Now Courier, LLC v. Better Carrier Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. In Re McBurney Law Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. Trahan v. TrahanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hope Billings McCulloch v. James Robert McCullochSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  2. James H. Arnold v. Thomas L. Arnold, Jr., individually and in his capacity as Trustee of the Thomas L. Arnold Jr. TrustSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  3. Esposito v. EspositoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  4. Diane Giarrusso v. Paul GiarrussoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  5. John C. O'Donnell, III v. Anne A. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API