Legal Opinion

People v. Simard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1946No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 43,309PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of criminally procuring a miscarriage of a girl of the age of 15 years. We shall refer to her as the “girl” and to the young* man, who was responsible for her condition, as the “boy.” He was not yet 18 years of age at the time that the illicit relations took place. The mother of the girl suspected pregnancy. An examination of a specimen of the urine submitted to a doctor confirmed the suspicion. Thereupon the girl’s mother - informed the boy’s mother, and after consulting one another they decided that marriage was not desirable, for both the boy and girl were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HareMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. People v. PinkertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. SawickiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. People v. OsteenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. CashMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API