Legal Opinion

People v. Hare

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1885PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Exceptions before judgment, from Berrien. (A. J. Smith, J.) Information for murder. Respondent was convicted. A criminal examination before a justice takes the place of a presentment by the grand jury, and the statute under which it is conducted must be followed strictly : Tamer

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood J.

The respondent, Thomas Hare, and one Daniel Billington, were jointly complained of before Alonzo Plummer, a justice of the peace at Benton Harbor, for the murder of John McCrone, at the township of Benton, in Berrien county, on the 6th day of October, 1883. The complaint was made on the 29th day of December, 1883, by Isabella McCrone, the wife of the deceased. Warrant was issued the same day for the arrest of the defendants, and thereunder Hare was arrested on the 31st of December, and *508Billington, January 5th following, 1884. On January 7th the-defendants were taken into court, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Annis v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Evans v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Hitchcock v. BurgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API