Legal Opinion
Stojkovich v. Monadnock Building
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided May 16, 1996No. 1-95-3049PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) appeals from a jury verdict entered in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Stojkovich, in his suit for personal injuries resulting from a fall down an elevator shaft located in the Monadnock Building. Westinghouse claims that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict and its post-trial motion for the entry of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The plaintiff has cross-appealed from the denial of his pretrial motion for leave to file an amended complaint seeking…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Parker v. Four Seasons Hotels, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Holzrichter v. YorathAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Vincent v. Alden-Park Strathmoor, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Independent Trust Corp. v. HurwickAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.