Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Shell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1946No. 36147Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

Appellant Armstrong, by a replevin proceeding, seized four mules, one wagon and two sets of harness in the possession of appellee Shell. Armstrong owned the property. Shell based his right to possession upon an oral contract he claims was previously made with Armstrong. It is admitted that this contract, if made, was begun, negotiated and entirely concluded on Sunday. That rendered the contract invalid and unenforceable. Section 2368, Code 1942; Miller v. Lynch, 38 Miss. 344; Kountz v. Price, 40 Miss. 341; Block v. McMurry, 56 Miss. 217, 31 Am. Rep. 357; Grapico Bottling Co. v. Emis, 140…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grapico Bottling Co. v. EnnisMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kountz v. PriceMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Block v. McMurryMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Miller v. LynchMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Stamps v. FrostMississippi Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API