Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fowler v. Purkett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2004No. ED 84891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.

In his petition for habeas corpus, Richard Fowler (“Relator”) attacks the lawfulness of his confinement by the Superintendent of the Missouri Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, James Purkett (“Respondent”). Relator alleges he is being unlawfully restrained by Respondent because the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in sentencing him to thirty-years imprisonment for statutory sodomy. Relator argues the statute criminalizing his conduct was amended prior to sentencing, and as a result, he was entitled to be sentenced under the amended…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Brown v. GammonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. SprickSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  5. Merriweather v. GrandisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PeeplesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Elverum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Barr v. SteeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Edwards v. SteeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. STATE EX REL. KOSTER v. KoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API