Hull v. Hartley, 9-08-50 (1-12-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Charles Dean Hartley, appeals the judgment of the Marion County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment on his counterclaim to the plaintiffs-appellees, Douglas Hull, Brenda Armstrong, and Daniel Hull. On appeal, Appellant contends the trial court erred because he is now barred from presenting the case to a jury. For the reasons set forth herein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
{¶ 2} On August 20, 2007, the appellees filed a complaint in the Marion County Municipal Court seeking to evict Hartley. On August 30, 2007, Appellant filed an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baatz v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018