Legal Opinion

Hull v. Hartley, 9-08-50 (1-12-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 2009No. 9-08-50PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Charles Dean Hartley, appeals the judgment of the Marion County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment on his counterclaim to the plaintiffs-appellees, Douglas Hull, Brenda Armstrong, and Daniel Hull. On appeal, Appellant contends the trial court erred because he is now barred from presenting the case to a jury. For the reasons set forth herein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

{¶ 2} On August 20, 2007, the appellees filed a complaint in the Marion County Municipal Court seeking to evict Hartley. On August 30, 2007, Appellant filed an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baatz v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API