Hoskins v. Currin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The appellant challenges the validity of the judgment entered below on the ground that the courts of North Carolina are bound by the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States, Article IV, Section 1, to recognize and enforce the modified decree of the California court. Therefore, she takes the position that the court below was bound by the findings of the California court with respect to her present fitness to have the care and custody of Rodney Alan Currin, and that it was error to admit any evidence to establish facts contrary to those found by the California…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re AldermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Application of ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richter v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Weddington v. WeddingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- In Re Custody of HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Edwards Ex Rel. Edwards v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.