Legal Opinion
Rose v. Neubauer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1987No. C2-86-2197PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
John Rose appeals from a judgment entered after his case was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 41.02. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
In July 1984 Rose sued the drivers of two vehicles for injuries received in an accident on February 14, 1984.
On March 27, 1985, Rose’s attorney’s newly hired paralegal filed Rose’s complaint and interrogatories without the attorney’s knowledge. On April 10,1985, the Hennepin County chief judge issued an order requiring that all cases filed before July 1, 1985, must be certified ready for trial or continued before…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Kosloski v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Hill v. TischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Butkovich v. O'LEARYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Charson v. Temple IsraelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Thomas v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Halter v. UNI. OF MINN. BD. OF REGENTSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Peterson v. Texas Terrace Convalescent CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987