Legal Opinion
Schlott v. Zaremski
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 23, 1975No. FILE No. 46PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
On October 31, 1972, Aide M. Blackburn proposed, on a printed form supplied by the plaintiff, to purchase land located on Saw Mill Road in Torrington, Connecticut from the defendants for $61,500. The proposal contained the words “subject to the following terms and conditions a formal contract.” The words “subject to the following terms and conditions” were printed, and the words “a formal contract” were typewritten. The proposal, which recognized the plaintiff as sole agent and broker in the transaction, also contained terms as to cash, mortgage, zoning, and other matters not essential for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Atlantic Terra Cotta Co. v. Chesapeake Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Meagher v. ReeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fowler v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Bond v. General Accident Insurance Company, No. 538646 (Sep. 4, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Javit v. Marshalls, Inc., No. Cv91 0514729 S (Mar. 9, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Mikolinski v. Cumberland Mutual Fire Ins., No. Cv92-0338674s (Nov. 7, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997