Legal Opinion

Fludd v. South State Bank

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 7, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01959Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION LATOYA LASHAY FLUDD and WANDA ) SUE BUTCHER, individually, an on behalf ) of all other similarly situated, ) Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-1959-BHH ) Plaintiffs, ) Opinion and Order ) v. ) ) SOUTH STATE BANK, and DOES 1- ) 100, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________ ) This matter is before the Court on the Defendant South State Bank’s1 motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Latoya Fludd and Wanda Butcher’s first amended class action complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (ECF No.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API