Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Conrad v. Stone

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Clinton. (Smith, J.) Information in the nature of a quo warranto to test the legality of respondent’s claimed election as a member of the board of school examiners. Respondent brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

By section 1, chap. 12, Act No. 266, Laws of 1887, the chairmen of the boards of school inspectors of the several townships in each county are required to meet at the office of the county clerk of their county on the first Tuesday in August in each year, and elect by ballot one school examiner, who shall hold his office for two years, or until his successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

Section 12 of the same chapter provides:

“Whenever, by death, resignation, removal, or otherwise, a vacancy shall occur in the board of school examiners of any county, other than in the office of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. AmyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lathen v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
  3. Andrews v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Howland v. PrenticeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Attorney General Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API