Cleveland v. Amy
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to pay an order for teacher’s wages. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
Eelator is a school-teacher, and on the 31st day of August, 1891, entered into a written contract with Daniel B. Sanders, P. H. Doyle, and the respondent, who then constituted the district hoard, to teach the school in said district, commencing on September 7, during the term to be voted by the district at the annual meeting. An order was duly issued by Mr. Doyle as moderator, and Mr. Sanders as director, drawn upon *376respondent as assessor, for the payment to relator of a certain sum due him as wages. The assessor declined to pay, and relator petitions for a writ of mandamus to compel such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tappan v. School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Conrad v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farley v. Board of Education of City of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Calloway v. Atlanta Rural High School, District No. 2Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Davis v. Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. School District No. 57Superior Court of Delaware · 1898