Legal Opinion

Smith v. Newell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, J.:

George R. Newell et al., as trustees of the Presbyterian Church of Orlando, Florida, in June, 1890, sued Charles H. Smith in the Circuit Court of Orange county in an action of debt upon the following contract for the purchase by the defendant of a lot of land: “This agreement made this sixth day of April, A. D. 1889, between J. W. Anderson, S. E. Ives, Geo. R. Newell, C. H. Munger and C. G. Lee, as Trustees of the Presbyterian Church of Orlando, Florida, parties of the first part, and Chas. H. Smith, of Orlando, Florida, party of the second part, witnesseth: That the parties of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Scofield v. TompkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Foley v. McKeeganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Watt's Ex'rs. v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  5. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Poinsettia Dairy Products, Inc. v. the Wessel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Pembroke v. CaudillSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  4. Stenor, Inc. v. LesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  5. Moses v. AutuonoSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API