Legal Opinion

Gregg v. Louden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was a complaint by the appellant against the appellee, to review a judgment. The complaint,, as amended, was in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was struck out and set aside by the court; nothing as to this ruling was reserved by bill of exceptions, and hence,, although the action of the court is assigned as an error, no question is before us. Schmidt v. Colley, 29 Ind. 120. There are many other cases to this effect.

A demurrer to the second paragraph was sustained, and this action of the court is also assigned as an error. The-material facts alleged in that paragraph are the following:

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Schmidt v. ColleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitehall v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Cartwright v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Alexander v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Osgood v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Debolt v. DeboltIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API