Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Colley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, C. J.

This record presents no question in such a manner that the appellant can avail himself of it in this court. All the errors alleged are on account of motions sustained and overruled. There is no bill of exceptions. Thus a paragraph of the appellant’s answer was stricken out, on motion. Then it was no longer a part of the record, unless made so by a bill of exceptions. We cannot properly know what the paragraph was. The clerk professes to copy it into the transcript, but this he had no authority to do. He cannot retain in the record that which the court has stricken out. The other questions…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woods v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Smith v. State ex rel. HamillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ryan v. BurkamIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Gregg v. LoudenIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Jones v. NoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API